Archive for October 11th, 2009

Attorney General Debate

At the Florida State Democratic Party Conference on Sunday morning was the hotly-anticipated debate between Attorney General candidates Dave Aronberg and Dan Gelber. Although both campaigns had an active presence throughout the Conference, Sunday morning revealed a Gelber juggernaut in the debate hall. Several hundred dollars worth of glossy yard signs and perhaps gratuitously pandering palm cards littered the venue, while Aronberg’s hand-drawn signs filled every other seat. Gelber supporters in vivid t-shirts crowded the halls and the venue, pasting Gelber stickers on the slow-moving and cooperative alike. There was a pretty obvious attempt to project the aura of inevitability.

The aura was interrupted by Gelber’s opening shot on vouchers, which was returned by Aronberg equating the comment with Republican smear jobs. After that, the two candidates couldn’t say too many times how much they liked each other. Aronberg’s answers were consistently, if not overwhelmingly, sharper and more coherent than those of his opponent. Senator Gelber felt it necessary to mention three times that his wife was also a federal prosecutor, seemingly implying that prosecutorial talent can be sexually transmitted and that he was thus twice as qulaified as Senator Aronberg to be AG. Aronberg made the risky move of calling for reforms in sex offender laws but didn’t seem to lose the audience. The crowd, which seemed like a Gelber fan club at the beginning, definitely warmed to Aronberg by the end. One leading YD looked at Sen. Aronberg and said “future Governor.” I think the YD might be right.

A Star is Born

At the 2009 Florida State Democratic Conference on Saturday, the organizers arranged the usual dog-and-pony show, putting telegenic Democrats on giant screens in front of cheering Democrats in what can only be described as a sporting event. Every forceful phrase was rewarded with applause and cheers. There is always something North Korean about the atmosphere at a party event. During Bill Nelson’s address, however, the North Korean vibe was broken by hundreds of angry hecklers screaming “Public Option!” at every pause in the Senator’s remarks. Nelson kept to his rambling speech, talking about everything but the issue on everyone’s mind, even taking refuge in a gratuitous display of Obama-humping over the catcalls. Finally, he came to the subject of the health care bill to cheers and more calls of “Public Option!” When Nelson pledged to support a watered-down version of the public option proposed by New York Senator Chuck Schumer, the crowd let him finish in peace.

Next to speak was 8th District Congressman Alan Grayson, who recently opined that the Republican health reform plan was for sick people to die quickly. The crowd lost its collective senses. Wild applause filled the hall. I had thought that party leaders may have been nervous about Grayson’s incendiary language, but they were clearly encouraging it by giving him a prime time slot after the keynote. Grayson, of course, stole the show, repeating his greatest hits to wild acclaim and clearly eating it up. He proposed that the Democratic Party be renamed the Conscience Party and the Republican Party the Party of Selfishness. The language came off a bit cynical and pandering, but the crowd was wholly uncritical. There’s no doubt there’s a great deal of sincere feeling behind Grayson’s rhetoric, but the simplicity of the language seems crafted. He was one of the few mainstream Southern Democrats in recent years to approach a critique of conservatism itself. Grayson’s popularity holds out hope of a new era of Progressive dominance in the Party.

The Congressman has been making the rounds on television and distributing his clips on the Web. His fundraising has been brisk, and it appears he will not have to use his own money this cycle. Of course, Congressman Grayson’s popularity comes at a bad time. He probably will not enter the Senate race this late, and the next shot will be Nelson’s seat in 2012. He might take it, but the Party would seek to stop him. The only other prize is re-election, which seems like a lot of effort for a small reward. Acclaim like this never lasts.

One wonders if this was calculated or just, as one observer out it, “Alan being Alan.”

Tags: , , ,

Because We Can

fa_2009_conferenceI just got back from the Florida Democratic Party’s 2009 State Conference. Like in 2007, I was struck by the contrast between the sparkling talent on offer from some of the party’s candidates and the lackluster leadership and organization of the event. The schedule, as usual, could be classified as Science Fiction, and the dominant experience during daylight hours seemed to be hordes of confused-looking delegates trying to find events moved halfway across the building.

Michael Arth, the serious but seriously dark-horse candidate for Governor, rented a table and occupied it on Friday to find it moved to the ghetto on Saturday morning with all his campaign materials “placed in storage” without his knowledge. (Where I come from, we call this stealing.) He chose to confront his tormentors politely through the viewfinder of a video camera, so of course venue staff helped him move to an acceptable location near some actual humans. Apparently, the rule is to speak softly and shoot in HD. Nobody likes to be a jerk on YouTube.

The Party’s consistently antagonistic attitude toward Mr. Arth and other long shots for statewide office mystifies me. The concern expressed is that disunity threatens victory in 2010, but of course the nastiness just gives him publicity among Democrats dissatisfied with Tallahassee, which is more than a few. On their own, these candidates would get their 25 percent and be gone. Who would notice or care? Why run the risk of bad press? Giving all the minor candidates for Governor access to favorable table locations, speaking engagements, email lists and other goodies would cost the party very little, disrupt events less, and build goodwill among those Progressives inclined to view the arbitrary exercise of power darkly. It certainly wouldn’t threaten Ms. Sink’s all but certain run to the nomination. Their answer is that they’re not required to do that, which is a non sequitur.

Tags: , , ,