Posts Tagged health care

Well, They Certainly Showed Me…

I owe this President and Congress a sincere apology. They delivered a serviceable bill under the most adverse circumstances imaginable. The most egregious lies were widely peddled and believed. The largest news organization in the world was relentlessly trying to get Americans to believe that passing this bill would spell the end of Western civilization. Lunatics were toting military-style rifles outside town halls next to signs promising bloody revolution. Ordinary people were equating a rather tame package of reform with Socialism, Communism, Nazism.

Ending the practice of working families putting off treatment for serious disease until they reach the point of crisis will save families, employers and government untold billions. Getting and keeping Americans insured will help rein in costs. We will now begin to turn the corner on the epidemics of diabetes, heart disease, and obesity.

There is much to regret in the compromises that went into this bill, but its defeat would have spelled the death of reform hopes. Now we need to line up behind Rep. Alan Grayson’s Medicare You Can Buy Into Act. This is not the end, but it is the end of the age when serious reform could be seen as unrealistic. It is for this reason that I am filled with hope.

Tags: , , ,

The Myth of Bipartisanship

225px-Alan_GraysonWe have been assaulted for more than a year with the most extreme claims about the President. He was a secret extremist Muslim, we were told. No, a radical black supremacist Christian, wait, a socialist terror sympathizer. When he won the election last fall, I was stupid enough to believe that the rhetoric had peaked. Hah!

When he proposed the centerpiece of his domestic agenda, he carefully adhered to his campaign pledge of apolitical politics. He sat the “stakeholders” (vested financial interests, not the patients whose lives were at stake) at the table and gave away the winning run before kickoff. Single-payer proposals that would have improved standards of care, controlled costs, and guaranteed universal access were abandoned in favor of a wishy-washy “public option” that would accomplish none of those things. He declared again and again his intention to reach a “bipartisan” deal with Republicans in Congress, bending over backwards to avoid pissing off conservatives.

So, of course, town halls across America were surrounded by gangs of lunatics toting guns, warning of looming totalitarianism, and comparing our soft-spoken moderate President to Hitler. The lunacy was not limited to the parking lots, either. Republican lawmakers were gleefully spreading sleaze about “death panels” and decrying Democrats’ non-existent intention to “pull the plug on Grandma.” So much for the tone.

So, when Congressman Alan Grayson suggested that the Republicans’ Health Care Plan was for sick people to “die quickly,” I was shocked to hear Republicans complain about the incivility of it all. What national debate on health care were they watching? Perhaps they had stepped through an inter-dimensional rift from a parallel Earth where they had not spent the summer inciting domestic terrorists to kill Democratic politicians.

Congressman Grayson’s remark was relatively civil, by the standards of this debate. It was also relatively factual. Although prone to superficial stunts, Mr. Grayson’s commitment to his constituents is undeniable. He is rightly concerned about a monstrously dysfunctional health care system that is simply unsustainable.  The loss of life from our broken system is equivalent to 15 9-11s every year. This is an absurd and intolerable situation, and the Congressman’s edgy rhetoric is more than justified. While the Republicans chase phantom nightmares of totalitarianism, Americans are subjected to a kafkaesque labyrinth of insurance company rules as they watch their husbands and wives, their children and brothers, their fathers, sisters and mothers die when basic medical care could have saved their lives.

Courageous Progressives like Mr. Grayson are to be congratulated, but more importantly, they need our support. Please make sure the Republicans can’t knock him off next year by donating today.

Forget bipartisanship. To steal from Aaron Sorkin, our job is not to end the fight. It’s to win it. Hundreds of thousands of lives are in the balance, as is the economic security of our nation.

Tags: , , , ,

How We Lost The Public Option

Secretary Sebelius on Sunday claimed that the public health insurance option is “not an essential element” of health care reform. President Obama said at a town hall on Saturday that the public option was just “one sliver” of reform. This could hardly be more wrong. A universally accessible public option would give low-income people too rich for Medicaid access to meaningful health insurance and is the only way to approach universal access to insurance without a mandate or single-payer.

The wave of chronic conditions America faces over the rest of the century demand early detection and intervention to control the costs and misery that they produce. Gaps and lapses in coverage will make those diseases more expensive for those patients and the rest of us. Preventing those gaps in coverage will require serving the low-income patients currently ill-served by the current mix of overstretched public programs and private high-deductible plans and still bend the cost curve down. That will require a plan that can deliver overhead in the 3-6% range. Only a public plan can do that.

The best solution would have been to put the entire population on a very low overhead plan. This was HR 676, Medicare for Everybody, Single-Payer. It never had a chance. Both Houses “placed it off the table” before negotiations began. The reasons for that decision are irrelevant, its consequences are all too clear. Moderate Democrats now pronounce the barely adequate public option DOA in the Senate. Without single-payer to draw fire, the opposition can focus on defeating the public plan option, If they had focused their energy on the socialism (i.e., public policy with which conservatives disagree) of single-payer health care, we could respond with the massive market reform of retaining the entire private health insurance with a single public program with subsidies for those who earn up to 4 times the localized poverty rate. Conservatives would hail this as a leg-up to the middle class, rather than welfare. We would have gotten the public plan we wanted, with ribbons affixed. They would hail their great market-driven defeat of the evil socialism of the hated liberals and declare it a great victory,

Instead we took the bogeyman away before the game started, leaving the public option as the target of the antis. We did so hoping to make them pros. This was possibly the most naive moment in contemporary American politics. The antis are anti not because of the actuarial tables or because Ludwig Von Mises hated regulation, but because we’re not them. We can’t be trusted to worship at the alter of God, CEO, therefore we are the enemy of all that is fine and good.

President Obama and Congressional leadership egregiously underestimated the irrational sectarian motivations of their opponents and chose to try to accomodate them, which merely served to slide the agenda rightward while buying nothing we couldn’t already take were we willing to ignore those we beat in November, as they have done to us and will again.

Thus are 22,000 Americans a year sacrificed to the demon of “Dear God, don’t let us be seen being Democrats.” God Bless America.

Tags: , , , ,

The Bottom Line On Health Care Reform

Before we can start talking meaningfully about health care reform, we have to understand the nature of the problem.

The biggest national problem is the entitlement gap. Over the next seventy-five years, we have a shortfall in our entitlement programs of about 50 trillion dollars, give or take ten trillion. Most of that gap is in Medicare and Medicaid. The gap is based on extrapolating current trends in health care expenditures, but current trends are not sustainable. Diabetes, obesity, and heart disease are increasing at a frightening rate, and we are not detecting these diseases early, when they can be prevented or treated more cheaply. The problem is particularly bad at lower income levels, where people away away from doctors until conditions become obviously life-threatening. Treatment is then sought at emergency rooms, where it is most expensive.  There should be no deductibles or co-pays, therefore, for routine, diagnostic, and preventive care. That’s the only way we can control the spiraling cost of treating chronic disease.

The same logic demands that coverage be universal and life-long. Portability must be automatic. Gaps in coverage will result in billions of dollars for unnecessary treatment for chronic disease. A child born today has a ONE IN THREE chance of developing Diabetes during their life. If that doesn’t wake you up, I don’t know what will. Cutting into those numbers will reverse the rising cost trend more effectively than any other measure.

The fastest-growing component of costs is in pharmaceuticals. We need to close the “no negotiations” loophole in Medicare Part D. If we are the industry’s largest customer, they will negotiate with us or face cuts in pharmaceutical spending. It’s not the taxpayer’s job to put money in the pockets of Big Pharma shareholders. We’re paying the highest drug prices in the world and it is time we stopped.

We also need to stop pretending there is some artificial dividing line between agricultural policy and health care. We are subsidizing the production of astronomical quantities of refined carbohydrates that are converted directly to glucose in the blood-stream, overwhelming the body’s capacity to absorb them. This is why obesity and diabetes are out of control. We evolved in an environment where fats and sugars were rare. Our bodies are optimized to process them as efficiently as possible. When placed in an environment where fats and sugars are the most plentiful foods, that efficiency kills us. The dietary habits of humans are very sensitive to considerations like convenience and cost. Artificially subsidized fats and sugars are helping to make us sick.

Tags: , ,

Personal Responsibility

rush_limbaughThe election of President Obama has done at least one thing to improve the political climate, and that is to put health care front and center as an issue. That’s fortunate, because we have been ignoring multiple parallel crises in the American care system for decades, and the consequences are becoming deadly serious. We spend more than any other country on health care, and we get less for our money than any industrialized nation.

The first problem is under-participation. The AMA has estimated that more than half of Americans do not have their own Primary Care Physicians.  Add to that, of course, the more than 50 million Americans with no health coverage at all, and you can see that more than 150 million people in this country are not getting regular checkups, do not have the medical care they do receive coordinated by anybody, have no central store for medical records, have no way to manage the risk of pharmaceutical interaction, are not detecting disease early and are not treating it effectively. We can see the consequences when more than ten percent of our health care costs stem from one disease: Diabetes. Since most diabetes is Type 2, the vast majority of these costs are preventable through early risk identification and lifestyle changes. Instead, we are spending hundreds of billions of dollars to treat people who should never have been sick.

The second problem is the role of profit in the health insurance industry. It’s not simply that thirty percent of our extravagant spending goes to profit and the recision and denial mechanisms necessary to protect it, but the profit motive of employer-based care produces perverse incentives. Care is denied whenever possible. Early intervention is denied to minimize “medical loss,” even though it would reduce future outlays, because insurers do not know if they will cover the patient when they get sicker. They have no incentive to reduce their future costs by eliminating deductibles and co-pays for diagnostic and preventive care. Thus the financial incentives of insurers are perversely related to the health outcomes of their policyholders. Insurers are profitable while Americans become sicker every year.

The third problem has been the least-discussed: the subsidized corn sugars and soy oils that are killing us. The modern epidemics of obesity and diabetes are directly related to the late twentieth-century surge of subsidies into factory farms that produce little but empty calories. Our foods contain steadily diminishing quantities of vitamins, anti-oxidants and amino acids as a giant biochemistry experiment engulfs its third generation. The health consequences of our fast-food culture are so severe that life expectancies are actually beginning to drop.

So, we’re facing a fifty trillion dollar Medicare iceberg at the same time we’re spending tens of billions a year to subsidize the foods that are killing us. But conservatives choose to blame poorly educated working class families with little money and less time for patronizing the businesses these same conservatives spend their time fighting for. The hypocrisy of it would be startling were not hypocrisy the operating standard of the conservative movement. On the one hand, the mounting data linking modern factory food to every form of chronic disease is dismissed as liberal “culture war” against good old-fashioned American food. On the other hand, people who uncritically consume this fare are blamed for the diseases that result. Don’t they know this stuff is bad for you?

All too often, they don’t. Industrial food is huge business in the United States, spending billions of dollars a year to market their products, targeted specifically at younger, poorer people who do not know about the link between the epidemics of diabetes and obesity and the food they are eating. Fast food outlets are located where poorer, less-educated people work, shop and live. Two-income families working three or four part-time jobs with little control over their working hours lack the ability to get together for a home-cooked meal. Even if they could make the time, they find that the fresh fruits and vegetables they need to stay healthy are not subsidized, not as available in their neighborhoods and require a struggle to get small children to eat, a struggle they no longer have the time or energy to undertake. So they get the fried chicken or the Happy Meal and stave off hunger for another day, frequently unaware that these foods are not just vaguely unhealthy but specifically deadly to precisely the kind of poorer, less-educated families the companies that sell them target with their advertisements and store placement.

So, minimum wage workers must show “personal responsibility” but food industry and health insurance executives are allowed, no, required, to cut any corner, tell any lie, spare no expense, walk away from any number of sick and needy people, to make profits that enrich them and their shareholders. If one were to wake up and say to herself “I make money from human misery and basic human decency demands that I stop,” she would be treated as mentally ill and possibly face tort action.

Capitalism is a vital part of modern society and I wouldn’t live in any country without it, but if there are no other values in a society save those of the marketplace, that society is in crisis. We have to stop arguing about the obvious and we have to stop treating corporate interests as if they were inviolate. Our physical and economic futures depend on it. Let’s put single-payer back on the table and justify it by pointing to the fiscal crisis in Medicare. And let’s stop paying Cargill, Monsanto and ADM to make us sick.

Tags: , , , ,

Giving Up Before The Ball Is Snapped

Here we go again

used with permission of the artist, "Tom Tomorrow"

America is facing a health care crisis, and Democratic leaders seem aware of it, but have decided that conceding every policy point to the Republicans before the legislative process begins is the best approach for achieving meaningful reform. That way, when Blue Dogs and the GOP push back, Congress can produce a meaningless, watered-down placebo perfect for giving the appearance of action while 22,000 continue to die unnecessarily every year. It makes me proud to be an American.

It started when our post-political President developed the framework of reform by inviting the insurance companies to hand over their wish list: mandates for coverage, no restrictions on anti-competitive business practices, and the ability to cherry-pick young healthy people out of the system while dumping everyone else into a public program that will eventually have to shut down for lack of funds. Congressional leaders then showed remarkable courage by placing the most meaningful reform option off the table: no nasty single-payer system. After all, a policy supported by only 59 percent of Americans absent any positive propaganda whatsoever is clearly a pie-in-the sky political non-starter. How dare 300 million mere citizens and taxpayers think that their lives and health are more important than the profits of tens of thousands of shareholders (i.e., people who matter)? The nerve of this rabble!

So instead of stupidly solving the problem of preventable disease, spiraling costs, 50 million uninsured, and about 75 million more insured in name only by risk-pooling and lifetime coverage, our paladins of Change are wisely choosing to construct another giant giveaway to industry sure to move this nation’s insolvency date just a little closer. Boy, I sure am glad none of those unrealistic nut-jobs were able to derail this sober political process!

After all, it worked for Global Warming!

Tags: , , ,

A Failed Strategy

obamaWhen Senator Obama ran his history-making campaign, he promised a post-partisan politics and, of all his promises, this may be the one he has adhered to most vigilantly. He has tacked to the center on national security and civil liberties, has included industry players in every major policy discussion, and gave House Republicans much of what they wanted on the stimulus bill. He got zero Republican votes for his efforts.

And that seems to be the trend. No matter how hard this administration tries to include opposition views and moderate its position, Republicans and, increasingly, moderate Democrats continue to obstruct and even to weave conspiracy tales of liberal perfidy. Cap-and-trade legislation with broad public support was rendered so feeble as to be unworthy of the trees to print it. Giving up single-payer health care in pursuit of a compromise “public plan option” looks increasingly unlikely to yield either. His very moderate Court pick is denounced in very public forums by very serious politicians as “racist.”

The Mr. Nice Guy routine is not working. America faces real crises in the years ahead, and “solutions” acceptable to everyone are not solutions at all. Health care isn’t unaffordable by accident; insurance and drug companies made their executives and shareholders rich making it so. Global Warming isn’t an act of God; Energy and Auto companies depend for their profits on dirty, unsafe fossil fuels. Solving the very serious problems facing America is going to mean pissing somebody off. The sooner we face that fact and build the coalitions necessary to win, the better.

Tags: , , , ,